Court declines to reconsider decision vacating Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Originally published January 28, 2013
The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Jan. 24 declined to reconsider a decision vacating the Environmental Protection Agency’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), which set new, tighter restrictions on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants in 28 states. The EPA and environmental groups had asked the full set of nine judges to overturn the August 2012 decision by a three-judge panel.
The decision most likely means that EPA must take another stab at dealing with the issue of cross-state air pollution under the Clean Air Act. The agency or environmentalists could appeal the CSAPR decision to the Supreme Court, but the high court is unlikely to take the case. The appeals panel’s August decision directed EPA to continue administering the Clean Air Interstate Rule—CSAPR’s predecessor—pending the issuance of a valid replacement.
Please Sign in to rate this.
Senior Vice President, Publishing
Jeanne Wickline LaBella
Editor, Public Power Daily
Fallon W. Forbush
Manager, Integrated Media
David L. Blaylock
Integrated Media Editor
- NYPA’s Quiniones, CPS Energy recognized for energy transformation efforts
- To reduce impact of regulations, DOE should comply with process rules, Association says
- Judge backs New York on plan to support nuclear generation
- House bill designates municipal bonds as high-quality liquid asset
- California prices increasingly mimic ‘duck curve,’ EIA says
- Officials urge public power utilities to be prepared for cyberattacks
- Public power utilities recognized for high customer satisfaction
- Lawmakers hear about capacity market flaws, rising grid costs
- Cyber Hygiene: Preventive Care to Avoid Electric System Decay
- Hamilton Utilities’ urban forestry program boosts safety, reliability