Consumer-owned utilities contest FERC compliance order on ISO-NE minimum offer price rule
Originally published March 20, 2013
A coalition of consumer-owned electric utilities (including APPA) has asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to rehear its Feb. 12 order approving a compliance filing by ISO New England on implementation of its minimum offer price rule in its "Forward Capacity Market." The request for rehearing is a protective move; consumer-owned utilities in New England already have asked the courts to overturn an earlier FERC order denying a self-supply exemption to the ISO’s minimum offer price rule, but the commission has argued that their appeal was premature.
The March 14 request for rehearing reiterates arguments that the commission lacks jurisdiction and that neither FERC nor ISO-NE has established that preventing price-taking offers from self-supply is necessary to ensure just and reasonable rates.
The consumer-owned utilities also argue that the Feb. 12 order errs in finding that consumer-owned entities' right to choose their capacity resources turns on other stakeholders’ choices. The commission held that the ISO was not obligated to propose a self-supply exemption because New England stakeholders had failed to conclude that action was necessary. That a diverse group of stakeholders did not support an exemption proves nothing, the consumer-owned utilities said. "In any case, the Commission may not delegate to New England’s stakeholders its statutory obligation to ensure that rates are just, reasonable and not unduly discriminatory," they said.
Joining in the rehearing request are APPA, Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co., New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Northeast Public Power Association and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association.
A separate request for rehearing was filed by a group of Massachusetts public power utilities: Braintree Electric Light Department, Hingham Municipal Lighting Plant, Reading Municipal Light Department, Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant and Danvers Electric Division. They argued that ISO-NE’s system unreasonably discriminates against generating capacity developed by consumer-owned utilities by inevitably requiring that consumer-owned utilities undergo project-specific review of their bids, "notwithstanding the absence of any conceivable question that the bid price for such capacity is based on the bidder’s actual costs."
Please Sign in to rate this.
Senior Vice President, Publishing
Jeanne Wickline LaBella
Editor, Public Power Daily
Fallon W. Forbush
Manager, Integrated Media
David L. Blaylock
Integrated Media Editor
- Solar deal places nonprofit under state law, N.C. appeals court says
- Hurricane Maria hits already reeling Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico
- House subcommittee schedules additional power industry hearings
- FERC says N.Y. agency relinquished right to act on certification tied to pipeline
- Sponsored Advertising FeatureWorkforce automation helps utilities avoid operational headaches
- Florida public power utilities close in on completing power restoration
- NREL says installed cost of solar power hit record lows in Q1
- Small Iowa city launches municipalization study
- Public power to participate in DOE-funded grid resilience, cybersecurity projects
- Boulder says PUC ruling gives city a 'path forward' for municipalization